Sanctions on Iran, seriously?

Hello and welcome to my latest political diatribe.  Today's issue that I have decided to publicly scorn has to do with an article discussing President Obama's desire to see "sanctions" implemented against Iran within weeks.  Well I'm sure he would love to see that, it's not going to happen because we would need to get Russia and China on board before we can implement sanctions and both of those countries rely on Iran for oil.  There is a certain amount of irony that America is often accused of going to war for oil, and yet oil is the reason that Iran is getting away with their shenanigans, but that's an issue for another day.  What I want to know is why are we still considering sanctions?  Have sanctions ever worked?  They didn't work in Iraq, they haven't worked in North Korea, they haven't worked in Cuba, they didn't work in Serbia and the list goes on.  Why are we still wasting time and energy pursuing a policy that has no possibility of achieving anything?  I know the main argument for sanctions is that it is preferable to war.  Well is it really?  Who suffers when sanctions are implemented against a country?  It's not the leadership, there's always somebody out there who is willing to deal with the rich.  The only people who sanctions affect are the poor.  Kim Jung Il is still drinking his cognac despite the UN sanctions prohibiting it.  Does anybody really believe that Iran is going to stop its nuclear program based on the threat of "sanctions?"  What's really sad is that the Iranian people are obviously dissatisfied with their government given the recent demonstrations in that country.  What did the US do when those people were protesting against their tyrannical government?  Where were we?  There are only two options left to us: we can do nothing (this option includes sanctions since it amounts to the same thing) and let Iran develop nuclear weapons, and anyone who doesn't believe that this is Iran's ultimate goal is simply not paying attention, or we can take out Iran's nuclear facilities.  I'm not advocating war with Iran.  Israel bombed Syria's nuclear facilities a couple of years ago and it didn't start WW III.  There are those that would argue that this would be an act or war and maybe it would be, but let's examine Iran's actions towards the US.  Iran has supplied and continues to supply insurgent groups in Iraq with weaponry that is used, with Iran's tacit approval, against US forces (which is an act of war by the way).  Iran provide financial and logistical support to known terrorist organizations who are bent on the destruction of not only Israel, but the United States as well.  Iran provides asylum to radical Islamic groups such as the Badr brigade that have participated in attacks against US forces.  The Iranian government has long considered the US to be the great Satan and views the US, not Israel as its primary enemy.  So I have a hard time understanding a) why we even consider letting Iran get their hands on nuclear weapons, and b) why we're squeamish about taking these sites out.  We're not talking about invading Iran or attacking a civilian population, we're talking about bombing sites we're a hostile government is producing weapons of mass destruction.  So if we want to pass sanctions against Iran in the hopes that it will see the light, forgo it's nuclear program and become a productive member of the global community by all means go ahead, but don't hold your breath.

The Blog is Back

It has been about two years since my last entry and I had pretty much given up on blogging.  However I have recently found myself growing increasingly frustrated with the direction the country is taking.  I just finished reading a news story about President Obama stating that the core of the tea party movement was fundamentally opposed to him because they didn't believe he was eligible to be president, which was a not so subtle reference to the "birther" movement.  It wasn't the article that prompted me to revive the blog.  Following the story readers were able to post comments and it was the amount of hateful things that both side would say about each other that got me upset.  Ninety percent of the comments posted didn't even attempt to make a rational argument supporting their particular point of view, they were just slinging insults against republicans, democrats, Bush, Obama and the other commenters.  I would like to know how we got to this point?  I realize people get fired up about politics and I'm all for passionate debate, but why can't we debate our point of view and respect those who may not feel the same way.  I also realize that the Internet gives us a sense of anonymity that emboldens some cowards to make statements that they would never make in a face to face setting.  I think that it's sad that these people don't realize that both parties have long since stopped representing the American people.  Our country is on the wrong track and slinging insults at each other won't fix anything.  There were a great deal of comments directed at the tea party movement calling them unpatriotic or a referring to them as a bunch of nuts.  I support the tea part movement inasmuch as it's a group of citizens who don't like whats going on in our country and want to see some changes.  I don't necessarily agree with their positions on every issue and quite frankly there are some nuts out there, but in a country where less than half of the eligible population turns out to vote for their leader, any indication of a widespread interest in making the country a better place is a positive thing.  So the question you may be asking at this point is "Well who is to blame for the current state of things?" Well I think that both political parties are to blame, they are so concerned about scoring political points or damaging the other party they can't be bothered with mere details such as governing a country.  A couple of years ago Apple computers was in a slump and Steve Jobs took a salary of one dollar a year until things turned around.  Lee Iaccoca did a similar thing with Chrysler.  I think it would be a good gesture to the American people if congress were to forgo their salary until this economic mess that they have been instrumental in creating is over.  They are certainly eager to implement restrictions and penalties on corporations who they feel are deserving of a bailout, but who implements restrictions on congress?  However it's not just congress to blame; the American people who's apathy towards their country allow incompetent people to be elected and re-elected share in the blame.  People without the self-discipline to not take out a home loan they can't afford just because the bank is willing to lend it to them share in the blame.  America needs to wake up, they need to elect leaders who are willing to work for the people, who understand that government service is, in fact, service.  America needs to be willing to get rid of those who are not doing the job that they have been sent to do.  There is no excuse for members of congress missing votes, if they're missing votes who's representing the people who elected them?  Congress needs to be accessible to the people or they lose touch with the people.  There are real solutions that can fix our country, but we need to work together and not against each other.  I recently read a book by Orson Scott Card called "Empire" it's about a modern day civil war in the United States, but the division this time wasn't geographic it was ideological.  The right versus the left.  At the time I thought it was an interesting book, but kind of far-fetched.  Now I'm not so sure, there is a lot of hate out there and I am afraid to think of where we'll end up if we continue on this path.  We'll I've rambled long enough.  I doubt anybody but Lucy will even read this, but as I told her earlier I have to start somewhere.